Topic summary
⁠45%3 analyzed articles/videos2,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Romance results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,486 hits. Analysis detected 10,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,957 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (11,491 of 15,447 topics). This Romance is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Romance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,957
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos