Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Armstrong results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 6,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,681 of 6,382 authors). This Neil Armstrong is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Neil Armstrong
Author details
Total words: 11,272
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst