Topic summary
⁠59%4 analyzed articles/videos607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Resignation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 4,912 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,500 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,925 of 16,562 topics). This Resignation is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Resignation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,500
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos