Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religious Persecution results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,895 hits. Analysis detected 18,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,609 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,512 of 15,765 topics). This Religious Persecution is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Religious Persecution
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos