Topic summary
97% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regime Change results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 3,450 hits . Analysis detected 28,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,646 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,389 of 15,701 topics). This Regime Change is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Regime Change
Topic details
Total words: 18,646
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst