Author summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agence France-Presse results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,321 of 6,200 authors). This Agence France-Presse is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Agence France-Presse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠79%Agence France-Presse (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,560
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.7%23.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos