Topic summary
52% 16 analyzed articles/videos 11,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Justice results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 6,791 hits . Analysis detected 69,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 74,855 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,493 of 15,780 topics). This Racial Justice is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Racial Justice
Topic details
Total words: 74,855
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles74.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst