Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Naomi Bethune results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Naomi Bethune is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Naomi Bethune
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Naomi Bethune (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,229
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos