Topic summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos4,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psychedelics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,273 hits. Analysis detected 14,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,836 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,684 of 16,286 topics). This Psychedelics is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Psychedelics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,836
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos