Topic summary
64% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prison Reform results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,557 hits . Analysis detected 17,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,314 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,427 of 16,494 topics). This Prison Reform is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Prison Reform
Topic details
Total words: 20,314
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst