Author summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 11,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jimmy Vielkind results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,276 hits . Analysis detected 50,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,370 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,864 of 6,348 authors). This Jimmy Vielkind is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Jimmy Vielkind
Author details
Total words: 53,370
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles53.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst