Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thai Theodoro results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,009 of 6,263 authors). This Thai Theodoro is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Thai Theodoro
Author details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst