Topic summary
⁠43%5 analyzed articles/videos769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prime Minister results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,421 hits. Analysis detected 12,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,481 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,618 of 16,559 topics). This Prime Minister is better (less manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Prime Minister
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos