Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidents results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,252 hits. Analysis detected 15,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,811 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,206 of 15,704 topics). This Presidents is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos