Topic summary
65% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Security results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,070 hits . Analysis detected 15,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,084 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (10,665 of 15,359 topics). This Presidential Security is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Presidential Security
Topic details
Total words: 16,084
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst