DHS’s Office of Inspector Gen. Report: U.S. Secret Service had 2-minute warning of gunman on roof before Trump was shot 65%

By OAN Staff Brooke Mallory0%

7/2/2026, 6:24:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 607 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,804 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the article peer group.

A scathing federal intelligence report released by the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office of Inspector General has exposed even more catastrophic communication failures within the U.S. 
Secret Service. 
According to the report, the agency had definitive knowledge of an unknown man perched on a nearby roof at least two minutes before would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire on President Donald Trump during the July 13, 2024, rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. 
The findings further document a "cascading and wide-ranging" breakdown in security protocol, confirming that despite urgent, real-time alerts from local law enforcement and panicked rally-goers, the information "failed to reach the innermost security ring" protecting the now-president on stage. 
At the time, Trump was still the Republican presidential nominee. 
Additionally, according to the newly declassified investigative timeline, local counter-snipers and tactical units had flagged Crooks as highly suspicious nearly 90 minutes before the shooting, even photographing him with a rangefinder. 
However, the crisis escalated to a critical moment exactly two minutes prior to the first shots being fired, when multiple local law enforcement transmissions confirmed that the suspect had successfully scaled the roof of the AGR International complex with a gun. 
Since the Secret Service failed to establish a unified, joint communications command center with state and local police, these critical radio transmissions were entirely missed by federal agents, the report goes on. 
Instead of receiving more than 100 urgent local radio updates detailing the direct threat, the Secret Service command post received only a handful of fragmented phone calls and text messages  delaying life-saving intelligence. 
The federal report details how this total breakdown in command structure prevented federal snipers and Trump’s immediate protective detail from enacting emergency evacuation procedures before Crooks began his assault. 
While local officers desperately attempted to confront the gunman  including one Butler police officer who was forced to drop from the roof's edge after Crooks turned his rifle on him  Trump continued his address to the crowd completely unaware of the active threat. 
Seconds later, Crooks fired eight rounds from his AR-15-style rifle, miraculously just grazing Trump's ear. 
However, the gunfire fatally struck rally attendee Corey Comperatore, a former volunteer fire chief who died shielding his family, while also critically wounding two others before a Secret Service counter-sniper neutralized the gunman. 
The two other attendees who were critically wounded in the attack were David Dutch, 57, of New Kensington, Pennsylvania, and James Copenhaver, 74, of Moon Township, Pennsylvania. 
The two men underwent emergency surgeries at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh following the attack and survived. 
Despite definitive findings, left-leaning political corners of the internet erupted with unsubstantiated conspiracy theories in the weeks following the attack, with some viral posts falsely claiming the assassination attempt was staged while labeling the victims as "crisis actors." 
The Comperatore family has publicly condemned the online rumors, stating that the online falsehoods have deeply compounded their grief. 
Meanwhile, congressional investigators and independent watchdogs have labeled the event entirely preventable, pointing out that the Secret Service had previously identified the AGR rooftop as a high-risk line-of-sight vulnerability but chose to leave it unmonitored and unsecured. 
The revelation that federal leadership possessed a multi-minute window where the threat transitioned from a "suspicious person" to an active gunman on a roof has intensified demands for systemic reform within the agency. 
Lawmakers from the House task force investigating the assassination attempt state that these findings solidify a pattern of systemic negligence. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.7%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias9.7%This article: 7.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias7.1%This article: 5.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 14.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias14.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 17.7%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion5.6%This article: 6.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 4.8%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 40.9%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 13.6%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias40.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.8%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.6%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority31.6%This article: 6.1%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.9%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma6.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon6.3%This article: 18.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 8.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion18.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 3.4%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.4%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.9%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.7%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote22.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 28.2%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 11.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice28.2%This article: 0.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 6.3%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 6.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%OAN Staff Brooke Mallory: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

607 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers14%attributed speech525writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
DHS’s Office of Inspector Gen. • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageSecret Service • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageCorey Comperatore • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageComperatore family • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageHouse task force investigating the assassination attempt • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageoann.com • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words24% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-32.6 ptsWriter: 32.6%House task force investigating the assassination attempt: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-26.3 ptsWriter: 26.3%House task force investigating the assassination attempt: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%House task force investigating the assassination attempt: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%House task force investigating the assassination attempt: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.4 ptsWriter: 0.4%House task force investigating the assassination attempt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.