Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Pardon results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 2,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,155 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,841 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Pardon is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Presidential Pardon
Topic details
Total words: 2,155
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.3%10.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos