Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Harris results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 1,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 867 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (483 of 6,628 authors). This Kyle Harris is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Kyle Harris
Author details
Total words: 867
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles867 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 18.9% 18.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 15.6% 15.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 18.7% 18.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.9% 36.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 36.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 15.6%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst