Tina Peters’ attorneys ask Colorado Court of Appeals if it has the right to hear her appeal⁠80%

By Kyle Harris⁠0%

12/24/2025, 5:25:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Special Pleading, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 289 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,471 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the article peer group.

Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters is asking Colorado’s Court of Appeals to reconsider whether the state court has the right to hear her appeal in the wake of President Donald Trump’s pardon. 
If the court no longer has the right to try the case, she should be immediately freed, her attorneys argue. 
Peters is serving a nearly nine-year sentence at the La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo on convictions related to allowing unauthorized access to county voting equipment following the 2020 election. 
Earlier this month, Trump pardoned Peters. 
When her attorney served the pardon to the La Vista Correctional Facility demanding her release, an officer with the Department of Corrections turned down the request, the motion stated. 
Presidential pardons have long been considered applicable to just federal cases and do not necessarily apply to state convictions. 
State officials argued the pardon did not free Peters from her state convictions. 
But in the motion, lawyers for Peters argue Trump’s pardon applies to both state and federal cases. 
Her attorney, Peter Ticktin, views the case as a “poster child case” for how broadly presidential pardons can apply. 
“There is no question that the Pardon forgave federal offenses,” the motion states. 
“However, the Pardon also forgave Colorado state court convictions for actions Clerk Peters ‘may have committed or taken part in related to election integrity and security’ during the applicable time period.” 
The motion argues Peters is entitled to immediate release. 
Colorado’s Attorney General maintains Trump’s pardon does not apply at the state level and that Peters should remain imprisoned. 
Peters’ attorneys said the motion would be filed on Christmas Eve. 
Colorado Public Radio could not independently confirm if the motion had been filed yet with the Colorado Court of Appeals. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 3.3%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Kyle Harris: 8.2%Colorado Public Radio: 4.8%Anchoring Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 6.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 2.3%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 18.7%Colorado Public Radio: 5.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 21.8%Kyle Harris: 36.9%Colorado Public Radio: 26.7%Framing Effect21.8%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.7%Colorado Public Radio: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 3.5%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 11.1%Kyle Harris: 7.8%Colorado Public Radio: 7.6%In-Group Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 3.3%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 11.3%Colorado Public Radio: 19.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Kyle Harris: 2.2%Colorado Public Radio: 6.6%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Kyle Harris: 18.9%Colorado Public Radio: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 6.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 2.0%Colorado Public Radio: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 26.6%Kyle Harris: 8.9%Colorado Public Radio: 4.9%Self-Serving Bias26.6%This article: 17.6%Kyle Harris: 14.6%Colorado Public Radio: 3.3%Status Quo Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 10.7%Kyle Harris: 10.7%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.7%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 2.2%Colorado Public Radio: 3.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 5.3%Colorado Public Radio: 11.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.6%Kyle Harris: 6.6%Colorado Public Radio: 13.0%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.5%Kyle Harris: 15.6%Colorado Public Radio: 1.8%Begging the Question14.5%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 2.3%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.9%Kyle Harris: 2.3%Colorado Public Radio: 2.5%Slippery Slope6.9%This article: 17.3%Kyle Harris: 5.8%Colorado Public Radio: 0.6%Special Pleading17.3%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kyle Harris: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%

289 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.