Keyword summary
72% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Peters results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,761 hits . Analysis detected 16,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,997 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,970 of 37,536 keywords). This Tina Peters is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Tina Peters
Keyword details
Total words: 11,997
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst