Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlyn Kim results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 3,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 95% (352 of 6,628 authors). This Caitlyn Kim is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Caitlyn Kim
Author details
Total words: 1,353
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.7% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 18.0% 18.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 16.3% 16.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 25.4% 25.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 35.9% 35.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 35.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.4%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 18.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 16.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 10.0%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst