Topic summary
⁠81%3 analyzed articles/videos1,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Systems results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 3,164 hits. Analysis detected 21,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,421 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,777 of 16,562 topics). This Political Systems is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Political Systems
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.6%21.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos