Topic summary
59% 33 analyzed articles/videos 6,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmaceuticals results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 4,173 hits . Analysis detected 30,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,511 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,716 of 16,100 topics). This Pharmaceuticals is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Pharmaceuticals
Topic details
Total words: 30,511
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score33 analyzed articles30.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst