Topic summary
⁠83%4 analyzed articles/videos774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Negotiations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,134 hits. Analysis detected 10,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,384 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,716 of 16,562 topics). This Peace Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Peace Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 7,384
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos