Author summary
82%5 analyzed articles/videos1,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jude Russo results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 2,945 hits. Analysis detected 15,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,052 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,772 of 6,522 authors). This Jude Russo is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Jude Russo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%Jude Russo (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,052
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.6%26.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate