Topic summary
⁠94%4 analyzed articles/videos1,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pc Gaming results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,479 hits. Analysis detected 9,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,690 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,248 of 16,243 topics). This Pc Gaming is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Pc Gaming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,690
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos