Topic summary
90% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Source AI results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,102 hits . Analysis detected 12,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,762 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,827 of 15,759 topics). This Open Source AI is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Open Source AI
Topic details
Total words: 9,762
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst