Topic summary
45% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Source results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,818 hits . Analysis detected 19,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,926 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,460 of 16,356 topics). This Open Source is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Open Source
Topic details
Total words: 20,926
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst