Author summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Wallen results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,628 hits . Analysis detected 13,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,820 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,515 of 6,296 authors). This Jack Wallen is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Jack Wallen
Author details
Total words: 14,820
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst