Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,698 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Brandom results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 6,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,576 of 6,602 authors). This Russell Brandom is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Russell Brandom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠46%Russell Brandom (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,792
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.9%11.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos