Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Radhika Rajkumar results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,677 hits. Analysis detected 13,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,500 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Radhika Rajkumar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Radhika Rajkumar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Radhika Rajkumar (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 13,500
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos