Topic summary
58% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Safety results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,501 hits . Analysis detected 11,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,951 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,034 of 15,526 topics). This Online Safety is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Online Safety
Topic details
Total words: 11,951
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst