Author summary
69% 3 analyzed articles/videos 354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachyl Jones results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , False Dilemma , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 363 hits . Analysis detected 2,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,739 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,165 of 6,316 authors). This Rachyl Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Rachyl Jones
Author details
Total words: 2,739
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst