Topic summary
⁠38%3 analyzed articles/videos1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Dating results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 6,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,072 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,604 of 16,562 topics). This Online Dating is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Online Dating
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,072
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos