Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos1,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Trade results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 5,845 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,331 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,737 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Trade is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Oil Trade
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,331
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos