Topic summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nypd results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,728 hits . Analysis detected 14,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,048 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,127 of 16,562 topics). This Nypd is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Nypd
Topic details
Total words: 18,048
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst