Topic summary
69% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nostalgia results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 3,737 hits . Analysis detected 39,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,189 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,857 of 15,854 topics). This Nostalgia is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Nostalgia
Topic details
Total words: 45,189
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles45.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst