Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Korea results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 915 hits . Analysis detected 8,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,389 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,398 of 16,559 topics). This North Korea is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. North Korea
Topic details
Total words: 8,389
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst