Trump’s 15-foot gold statue of himself at his Florida golf course compared to North Korea’s Dear Leader 81%

By Owen Scott0%

4/29/2026, 3:19:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 470 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 72.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,253 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the article peer group.

A 15-foot gold statue depicting President Trump has been compared to monuments to North Korea’s former dictators. 
Nicknamed “Don Colossus,” the statue stands at the Trump National Doral Miami and was erected just a week before the PGA Tour’s Cadillac Championship. 
However, social media users have been quick to compare the structure to a pair of statues dedicated to former Supreme Leaders Kim Il-sung and the so-called “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-il. 
“Trump’s Doral National golf course in Miami installs gold statue of Trump, which is remarkably similar to one of Dear Leader in North Korea,” Mike Sington, a former NBCUniversal senior executive, wrote on X. 
Dr Sam Youssef, an internet personality and frequent Trump critic, wrote on X that the president had achieved his “dream of becoming like North Korean leaders” with the statue. 
“What else would you expect,” professional golfer Rickie Fowler told Golfweek. 
Trump had a fractious relationship with Kim Jong Un, North Korea’s current supreme leader, during his first term. 
He dubbed the dictator “Little Rocket Man,” and claimed that his nuclear button was “much bigger” than Kim’s. 
The pair would go on to reconcile, as Trump claimed they “fell in love” after the autocrat sent him “beautiful letters.” 
As recently as this April, Trump said that he “got along very well” with Kim and that the North Korean dictator used a derogatory term to mock former President Joe Biden’s mental fitness. 
Some golfers and PGA Tour staff have been reluctant to pose with the Trump statue, which shows the president raising his fist, as he had during an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania in 2024, according to Golfweek. 
Maverick McNealy told the website that he had not decided whether to take a selfie with the statue, which he described as “very tall and very gold.” 
When a tournament photographer asked members of the Tour staff if they wanted a photograph with the statue, he was met with a resounding “no.” 
“Ok, I didn’t know you were all so woke,” he responded, according to Golfweek. 
The 3.1-ton statue, made of bronze, was designed by Ohio-based artist Alan Cottrill. 
However, Cottrill told The Columbus Dispatch that he had previously been embroiled in a payment dispute with $PATRIOT, the cryptocurrency group that commissioned the statue back in August 2024. 
Cottrill had been paid $300,000 for the bronze and $60,000 for the gold leafing covering the statue. 
The artist said that the dispute began after the $PATRIOT started using the statue’s likeness to sell crypto tokens. 
That prompted him to hold the statue in a secret location in Muskingum County until he was given full payment. 
The White House has maintained that it is not involved in the crypto project or the related statue. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 5.1%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias5.1%This article: 11.3%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic11.3%This article: 7.2%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Owen Scott: 5.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect10.2%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 37.7%Owen Scott: 8.4%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias37.7%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.1%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.8%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias10.9%This article: 4.5%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.1%Owen Scott: 4.4%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority11.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.4%Owen Scott: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon6.4%This article: 6.2%Owen Scott: 5.9%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 2.3%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 12.1%Owen Scott: 3.2%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 30.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal30.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 27.0%Owen Scott: 1.8%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)27.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.9%Owen Scott: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote17.9%This article: 7.2%Owen Scott: 2.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection7.2%This article: 6.2%Owen Scott: 3.1%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice6.2%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

470 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers54%attributed speech216writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMike Sington • 34 words • 100.0% coverageDr Sam Youssef • 29 words • 100.0% coverageRickie Fowler • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageGolfweek • 36 words • 100.0% coverageMaverick McNealy • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGolfweek • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Cottrill • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Cottrill • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Cottrill • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Cottrill • 20 words • 0.0% coverageThe White House • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Sington

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words13% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Sington: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Sington: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.