Topic summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos1,754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Jong Un results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 677 hits. Analysis detected 5,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,505 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,396 of 16,562 topics). This Kim Jong Un is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Kim Jong Un
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,505
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos