Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Carolina results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,538 hits. Analysis detected 18,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,263 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,438 of 16,562 topics). This North Carolina is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
North Carolina
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,263
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos