Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oliver Salt results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 892 hits . Analysis detected 7,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,700 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,435 of 6,135 authors). This Oliver Salt is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Oliver Salt
Author details
Total words: 6,700
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst