Topic summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 4,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Politics results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 5,987 hits . Analysis detected 42,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,213 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,302 of 15,344 topics). This New York Politics is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. New York Politics
Topic details
Total words: 39,213
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles39.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst