Topic summary
67% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Multiculturalism results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 2,401 hits . Analysis detected 15,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,915 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,674 of 15,689 topics). This Multiculturalism is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Multiculturalism
Topic details
Total words: 12,915
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst