Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nick Cater results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 774 hits . Analysis detected 5,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,107 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,382 authors). This Nick Cater is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nick Cater
Author details
Total words: 4,107
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.6% 13.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst