Author summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rakib Ehsan results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 533 hits. Analysis detected 3,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,430 of 6,360 authors). This Rakib Ehsan is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Rakib Ehsan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠78%Rakib Ehsan (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.1%20.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.6%10.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos