Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leander Schaerlaeckens results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,438 hits. Analysis detected 7,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,512 of 6,354 authors). This Leander Schaerlaeckens is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Leander Schaerlaeckens
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
61%Leander Schaerlaeckens (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,156
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos