Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb Trade Rumors results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,524 of 16,562 topics). This Mlb Trade Rumors is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Mlb Trade Rumors
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos