Topic summary
22% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lunar Missions results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,755 hits . Analysis detected 12,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,242 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (16,092 of 16,562 topics). This Lunar Missions is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Lunar Missions
Topic details
Total words: 26,242
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst