Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the Visual Journalism team results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,729 hits . Analysis detected 11,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,224 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,534 of 6,576 authors). This the Visual Journalism team is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. the Visual Journalism team
Author details
Total words: 19,224
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst